ANSWER :

Explanation : The word 'spurious' means opt1:genuine opt2:authentic opt3:substantial opt4:fake ans: fake Exp:

ANSWER : vague

Explanation : :

ANSWER : the centre should not block the sites

Explanation : :

ANSWER : ungovernable

Explanation : :

ANSWER : maintenance

Explanation : : The Cyber-World is ultimately ungovernable.This is alarming as well as convenient;sometimes,convenient because alarming.Some Indian politicans use this to great advantage .When there is an obvious failure in governance during a crisis they deflect attention from their own incompetence towards the ungovernable.So,having failed to prevent nervous citizens from fleeing their cities of work assuring them of proper protection ,some national leaders are now busy trying to prove to one another,and to panic-prone Indians,that a mischievous neighbour has been using the internet and social networking sites to spread dangerous rumours .And the centre's automatic reaction is to start blocking these sites and begin elaborate and potentially endless negotiations with Google, Twitter and Face book about access to information.If this is the official idea of prompt action at a time of crisis among communities ,then Indians have more reasons to fear their protectors than the nebulous mischief-makers of the cyber-world .Waste time gathering proof ,blocking vaguely suspicious-websites,hurling accusations across the border and worrying about bilateral relations are ways of keeping busy with inessentials because one does not quite know what to do about the essentials of a difficult situations.Besides,only a fifth of the 245 websites blocked by the Centre mention the people of the Northeast or the violence in Assam.And if a few morphed images and spurious texts can unsettle an entire nation,then there is something deeply wrong with the nation and with you it is being governed.This is what its leaders should be addressing immediately,rather than making a wrong headed display of their powers of censorship. It is just as absurp,and part of the same syndrome,to try to ban Twitter accounts that parody despatches from the prime minister's office.To describe such froms of humour and dissent as "misrepresenting".the PMO-as if Twitters would take these parodies for genuine despatches from the PMO-makes the PMO look more ridiculous than its parodists manage to .With the precedent for such action set recently by the chief minister of west bengal ,this is yet another proof that what Bengal thinks today India will think tomorrow.Using the Cyber-World for flexing the wrong muscleus is essentially not funny.It might even prove to be quite dangerously distracting .